Matusda’s article
is about how World English affects on writing. Teachers need to emphasize what
is suitable for the context but also linguistic information that the students
must know. The article has guideline to teach
WE in writing because it is so complicated to teach writing to some students. I
think writing is very hard and most complicated. Some ELL students can write
perfectly in writing but they are not fluent in other like speaking or
listening.
Kubota’s article
is about issues of globalization and she said that globalization has created
the discourse of kokusaika in Japan. The discourse of kokusaika is focus
teaching and learning a foreign language, especially English. In Japan, many
schools favor teachers from America and Britain. My boyfriend wanted to teach
in Japan after he graduated from ISU. He is fluent Japanese and lived in Japan
for a year and he is American. He graduated with 3.8 G.P.A. However, he got
denied two times for teaching in Japan because he wasn't qualified enough. He told
me that it is very hard to teach English in Japan.
It was very interesting to
see that the “learning English is the understanding of the world and cultural
diversity” (26) because English is international language. Japan is not the
only country to emphasize learning English. However, it seems like many
countries believe that fluent in English equals to succeed in life. I believe
that it is important to speak more than one language. However, people shouldn’t
force students to learn English. Many of my friends in Korea are so frustrated
because of English. One of my friends came to United States to learn English,
because he thought that he will get a job right away if he was fluent in
English. However, when he went back to Korea, he didn’t because he graduated
from a college that not many people know of. Then, he e-mailed me that how he
regretted that he came to United States. Another thing that bothers me is that many countries believe that by
bringing native speakers to the country, where English isn’t their first
language, is not going to help the students. For example, Korean students will
not be fluent in English because they will not use English as much as they use
Korean. Therefore, the country needs to emphasize on how to teach English
rather than hiring the native speakers because it doesn’t mean that they are
capable of teaching the students well. Also,
what happens if English became not international language? I feel like many
countries should emphasize on teaching their native language first and then
teach English. The reason is that if a student isn’t fluent in their native
language, they are not going to be fluent in their second language.
No comments:
Post a Comment